MCHI vs FXI: Which China ETF Should You Pick?

Both are US-listed iShares (BlackRock) China ETFs, so at a glance they look interchangeable — but they solve very different jobs. MCHI is the "whole market in one fund" default; FXI is a concentrated bet on China's 50 largest H-shares. Here is the head-to-head so you can choose on purpose rather than by ticker familiarity.

Side-by-side comparison

Verified snapshot figures (fees, AUM, holdings, yield) as of August 2026. Live prices as of Sep 14, 2026 (delayed Nasdaq snapshot, source: prices.json).

MetricMCHI — iShares MSCI ChinaFXI — iShares China Large-Cap
IssueriShares (BlackRock)iShares (BlackRock)
TracksMSCI China IndexFTSE China 50 Index
StrategyBroad, diversified ChinaLarge-cap H-shares (mega-cap tilt)
Listing mixOffshore: HK + US ADRs (~80% HK/US, ~17% A-share via Connect)Offshore: 100% H-shares (HK-listed, HKD)
Expense ratio0.59%0.74%
AUM$6.2B$4.2B
Dividend yield~2.0%~2.0%
# Holdings57552
Top holdingsTencent, Alibaba, China Construction BankAlibaba, China Construction Bank, Tencent
Last price$53.00 (Sep 14, 2026)$34.62 (Sep 14, 2026)
Best forCore, diversified China holding in one positionLarge-cap, income-tilted H-share exposure

How they actually differ

Breadth vs concentration

MCHI holds 575 companies; FXI holds just 52 (the FTSE China 50). If one mega-cap bank or a single regulatory move hits the big state-linked names, FXI feels it far more. MCHI's wide basket dilutes any one name. The trade-off: concentration is what gives FXI a cleaner "China blue-chip" tilt if that is what you want.

What is inside

MCHI spans the whole economy — banks, telecoms, energy, internet and the tech giants, across Hong Kong and US-listed ADRs, with a slice of mainland A-shares via Stock Connect. FXI is 100% H-shares — the largest HK-listed Chinese companies, heavily weighted to SOE banks, telecoms and energy. If you specifically want the onshore A-share economy, neither is ideal; ASHR (CSI 300) is the dedicated A-share route.

Cost and income

MCHI is cheaper (0.59% vs 0.74%). Both pay a similar dividend of about 2.0%, because both own high-yielding SOE banks and telecoms — FXI even more so, given its bank-heavy weighting.

Currency note

Both trade in USD on US exchanges, but the underlying FXI basket is almost entirely HKD-denominated H-shares, while MCHI blends HKD and USD (ADR) exposures. Either way you take on China equity risk plus USD/CNY (and for FXI, HKD) currency movement.

About trailing returns

We do not publish 1-year / 3-year / 5-year return figures on this page. Historical numbers change constantly and we will not show unverified performance. For current trailing returns, open the official issuer fact sheet (iShares for both MCHI and FXI) or use your broker's fund research page. What we can show with confidence is the verified structure above (fees, size, holdings, yield) and the delayed live price.

Which should you pick?

All figures above are indicative snapshots and can change. Treat them as a starting point, not live truth — confirm current fees, holdings and prices with the issuer and your broker before buying.
Not financial advice. An ETF is still equity risk; China exposure carries political, currency and regulatory risk. Size your position accordingly.

Related tools

China ETF Comparator → Compare MCHI, FXI, KWEB, ASHR, CQQQ and GXC side by side. MCHI vs KWEB → Broad market vs China internet, head to head. MCHI vs ASHR → Offshore broad market vs onshore CSI 300 A-shares, head to head. How to Pick the Best China ETF → Choose by strategy, not by ticker.