MCHI vs KWEB: Which China ETF Should You Pick?

Both are US-listed China ETFs, but they solve very different jobs. MCHI is the "whole market in one fund" default; KWEB is a concentrated bet on Chinese internet platforms. Here is the head-to-head so you can choose on purpose rather than by ticker familiarity.

Side-by-side comparison

Verified snapshot figures (fees, AUM, holdings, yield) as of August 2026. Live prices as of Aug 28, 2026 (delayed Nasdaq snapshot).

MetricMCHI — iShares MSCI ChinaKWEB — KraneShares CSI China Internet
IssueriShares (BlackRock)KraneShares
TracksMSCI China IndexCSI Overseas China Internet Index
StrategyBroad, diversified ChinaThematic — China internet only
Listing mixOffshore: HK + US ADRs (~80% HK/US, ~17% A-share via Connect)Offshore: HK-listed + US ADRs (internet platforms)
Expense ratio0.59%0.69%
AUM$6.2B$5.2B
Dividend yield~2.0%~0.5%
# Holdings57540
Top holdingsTencent, Alibaba, China Construction BankTencent, Alibaba, PDD
Last price$54.90 (Aug 28, 2026)$26.10 (Aug 28, 2026)
Best forCore, diversified China holding in one positionHigh-conviction China internet bet

How they actually differ

Breadth vs concentration

MCHI holds 575 companies; KWEB holds 40, all internet. If one platform gets hit by regulation or a single earnings miss, KWEB feels it far more. MCHI's wide basket dilutes any one name. The trade-off: concentration is what gives KWEB its upside if internet outperforms.

What is inside

MCHI spans the whole economy — banks, telecoms, energy and the tech giants. KWEB is pure internet commerce and services (Tencent, Alibaba, PDD, Meituan, JD, Bilibili). If you already own a broad fund, KWEB is how you "lean in" to internet without buying individual ADRs.

Cost and income

MCHI is cheaper (0.59% vs 0.69%) and pays a larger dividend (~2.0% vs ~0.5%) because it owns high-yielding SOE banks and telecoms. KWEB's internet names reinvest rather than pay out, so its yield is thin.

A-share exposure

MCHI gets roughly 17% of its basket into mainland A-shares through Stock Connect. KWEB holds none directly — it is entirely offshore (HK + US). If onshore access matters to you, MCHI (or a dedicated A-share fund like ASHR) is the route.

About trailing returns

We do not publish 1-year / 3-year / 5-year return figures on this page. Historical numbers change constantly and we will not show unverified performance. For current trailing returns, open the official issuer fact sheet (iShares for MCHI, KraneShares for KWEB) or use your broker's fund research page. What we can show with confidence is the verified structure above (fees, size, holdings, yield) and the delayed live price.

Which should you pick?

All figures above are indicative snapshots and can change. Treat them as a starting point, not live truth — confirm current fees, holdings and prices with the issuer and your broker before buying.
Not financial advice. An ETF is still equity risk; China exposure carries political, currency and regulatory risk. Size your position accordingly.

Related tools

China ETF Comparator → Compare MCHI, FXI, KWEB, ASHR, CQQQ and GXC side by side. How to Pick the Best China ETF → Choose by strategy, not by ticker. China Sector & Thematic ETFs → Internet, tech and A-share ETFs explained. MCHI vs ASHR → Offshore broad market vs onshore CSI 300 A-shares, head to head.