China Tech ETF Comparison: KWEB vs CQQQ vs TCHI vs CTEC

Four funds dominate the "China tech ETF" search, but they own very different baskets and cost different fees. Here is what each one actually is, and where it fits.

All figures are a 2026 snapshot from issuer fact sheets and public comparisons; holdings, expense ratios and assets change. Confirm the current prospectus before buying. Educational, not financial advice.

The comparison

ETFTickerTracksHoldings / AUMExpense
KraneShares CSI China InternetKWEBCSI Overseas China Internet (platforms only)~40 names · $5B+ AUM~0.67%
Invesco China TechnologyCQQQFTSE China Incl A 25% Tech Capped~170 stocks · $3.2B AUM~0.65%
iShares MSCI China Multisector TechTCHIMSCI China Tech + related sectors~broad tech · ~$46M AUM~0.59%
iShares MSCI China Tech UCITSCTECMSCI China Tech Sub-Industries (ESG screened)accumulating · >$2B AUM~0.45%

Pattern: KWEB is the concentrated internet bet; CQQQ is diversified tech; TCHI is the smallest and cheapest US-listed option; CTEC is the UCITS version for EU/UK investors and the lowest fee.

What each one is for

How to use a China tech ETF

China tech funds are satellite, not core. They have delivered big rallies in policy- or AI-driven recoveries and steep corrections when regulation or trade friction bite. A common framework is a broad China ETF (MCHI or FXI) as the core, with a 2–5% sleeve in KWEB or CQQQ for tech conviction. Leveraged 3x products (YINN/YANG) are for short-term trades only — volatility decay makes them unsuitable to hold.

Related tools & guides

MCHI vs KWEB: Broad vs Internet → The core-versus-thematic trade in one comparison. How to Pick the Best China ETF → Where tech funds sit inside the full lineup. China ETF Expense Ratio Comparison → Fee is only one axis — see the full table. China ETF Comparator → Compare funds side by side with live prices.