"China ETF" hides a big split: some funds own only the 50 largest companies, others reach hundreds of smaller domestic firms. The size bucket you pick changes what you actually own and how rough the ride is.
| ETF | Ticker | Tracks | Size bucket | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| iShares China Large-Cap | FXI | FTSE China 50 (largest H-shares) | Mega/large cap only | ~0.74% |
| iShares MSCI China | MCHI | MSCI China (large + some mid) | Broad large/mid cap | ~0.59% |
| Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 | ASHR | CSI 300 (largest A-shares) | Large-cap A-shares | ~0.65% |
| KraneShares MSCI China A50 | KBA | MSCI China A 50 Connect | Largest A-share blends | ~0.64% |
| Xtrackers CSI 500 Small Cap | ASHS | CSI 500 (mid/small A-shares) | Small / mid cap | ~0.65% |
Pattern: FXI is the purest large-cap bet; MCHI and ASHR add breadth but stay large-cap heavy; ASHS is the only mainstream fund that genuinely reaches China's smaller domestic names.
Large-cap China funds own the familiar giants — Tencent, Alibaba, ICBC, CCB, PetroChina, Kweichow Moutai. These are the most liquid, most-analyzed, and most-dual-listed names, so they are the easiest for a foreign investor to understand and the least likely to surprise on liquidity. The trade-off is concentration: FXI's 50 names mean a handful of banks and state firms drive a lot of the return.
For most foreign beginners, a broad large-cap ETF (MCHI or FXI) is the core: it is liquid, cheap and easy to explain. Small-cap (ASHS) is a satellite — a way to tilt toward China's domestic economy and away from the internet/platform mega-caps — sized at perhaps 2–5% of the China sleeve. The two are not either/or: holding MCHI plus a small ASHS sleeve gives you both the giants and the long tail.